Flickerings: INDEX OF MOVIE REVIEWSmovie camera


Jump to movies beginning with  


Hancock

Superhero fans will find it packs a decent punch.

reviewed by Mark Burns

A boozing uber-bruiser shambles up to his heroic calling in this fun spin on the superhero tale.

Hancock (Will Smith: I Am Legend) is an amoral do-gooder, a temperamental lush whose reckless heroics have the tendency to demolish Los Angeles’ cityscape. Consequently, Angelinos are spitting venom at their so-called protector. He seems doomed to remain the city’s lesser evil. That is, until Hancock’s path crosses with goody-two-shoes publicist Ray (Jason Bateman: Juno). Ever the optimist, Ray hatches a scheme to awaken the hero’s nobler spirit and polish his image. Hancock grudgingly plays along, discovering his forgotten past in the process of realizing his true potential.

This hero is unique amid this summer’s bumper crop of superhero cinema, his character and myth being the only fresh invention among them. A pluot amid the conventional fruits, you might say. It can be risky, nudging an unestablished, comedic superhero concept over the ledge. My Super Ex-Girlfriend fell flat, right beside The Mystery Men. But Hancock manages to fly pretty well.

Even the best superhero flicks tend to the formulaic, with smirking fanboy tributes, cheesy one-liners, clichéd characters and story hemmed by often-corny pulp lore. At its best, Hancock is refreshing for its independence. Screenwriter Vincent Ngo tinkers with a few what-ifs and emerges with a pretty original take on the genre.

Hints of other sources can be discovered: Hancock reminds a little of Superman after he was exposed to Richard Pryor’s kryptonite-lite; the context of disastrous civic consequence smacks of amusing reality check via The Incredibles; emerging lore is shaded with a darkening twist, dramatic smudging perhaps inspired by M. Night Shyamalan’s moody gem Unbreakable. Yet borrowing is light, never approaching the pratfall of rip-off.

Story is steady enough as Ray tries to shepherd the unloved hero unto adoration and higher purpose. Comedy, action and drama interplay nicely. But redemption comes suddenly, and complexities born of a fairly predictable plot twist don’t get sorted out cleanly. New and interesting dramatic angles are raised but not explored. The shift in tone is stark; the climax lacks for brighter counterpoints to float it out of the brutal. Still, the plot manages to hold center just enough to carry interest through to the end.

Director Peter Berg (The Kingdom) may let his attention wander from the story, but the action and special effects are first-rate. All the requisite feats of super-strength are present, tweaked with creative twists and comic touches.

Laughs succeed especially well in the first half. The interplay of cool heroics and their presumed real-world consequences provide sharp comedic tension between Hancock and the city of Los Angeles. His devil-may-care attitude and antipathy toward the very prattling public he serves makes for an amusing break from superhero tradition. A couple scenes lack snap and one running gag cramps up, but for the most part the humor is good fun.

Hancock isn’t spectacular, but it’s good, original fun. Superhero flick fans will find it packs a decent punch.

Good Action-Comedy • PG-13 • 92 min.


Horton Hears a Who! – Jonathan Parker

We learn a lesson and we feel an overwhelming sense of hope at the same time.

No one believes a humble and loveable elephant hears a tiny voice coming from a small speck on a flower in the enjoyable animated comedy Horton Hears a Who! This Dr. Seuss classic is spread thinly over 90 minutes but wins us over thanks to its warm heart and joyous climax.

Horton (voice of Jim Carrey) is a playful goof of an elephant who lives in a land with numerous creatures of all animal and Seussian sorts. Horton’s world perspective is thrown for a loop the day he hears and then starts talking to a voice coming from a little speck.

On the other end is the mayor of the happy-go-lucky land of Whoville (voice of Steve Carell). Horton realizes that he needs to get that land — the speck — to safety, while the mayor realizes he needs to warn his fellow citizens that they are in danger. No one believes Horton, and no one believes the mayor. Yet both know what they have to do.

There is always a danger in turning a Dr. Seuss story into a feature film. First, you are messing with a classic. Second, you are trying to stretch a very short poetic story into 90 minutes of entertainment. The latter is this film’s biggest shortfall. There is just not a lot going on here. As a result, simple plot lines are turned into 15-minute vignettes (though not songs, mercifully).

Carrey and Carell are asked to riff through much of their characters’ dialogue, and it grows quite strained quite quickly.

Frankly, the recent Hollywood practice of using bankable stars to insert their own personalities into the main cartoon characters doesn’t work all that well. More talented and interesting though less famous voices really do the job better (exhibit A: the Disney classics). In this film, the most interesting character is a buzzard with a deep Russian accent portrayed by TV supporting actor Will Arnett. The buzzard gets more laughs and has more personality than the big celebrity characters.

In the end, the Dr. Seuss-ness of the film carries the day. The animation is modern, but wonderfully stays true to the cartoonish Dr. Seuss look. More importantly, no one knows how to deliver a climactic scene quite like Dr. Seuss. We learn a lesson and we feel an overwhelming sense of hope at the same time. Who can ask for anything more?

Good animated comedy • G • 105 mins.


Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix – Mark Burns

Grab your nearest portkey for this one. The wizarding wunderkind enters his blue period in this capable adaptation.

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) skulks through summer break following a rough fourth year at Hogwarts. Cut off from the magical world, he’s left in the dark about evil wizard Voldemort’s uprising until an attack thrusts him back into the thick of things. The magical world proves not so welcome a place anymore, as Harry is rejected as an agitator, avoided by his mentor and addled by troubling dreams. Even Hogwarts is a tainted haven, as the Ministry of Magic foists itself upon the school through prissy menace Ms. Umbridge (Imelda Staunton, Freedom Writers), the latest Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher. So does the fifth year become a quest to loose the ministry’s girdle and follow troubling visions in a personal quest to check Voldemort’s rise.

Book five brought adolescent moodiness to bear on Harry’s character, and the film follows suit in its approach. The ambience is decidedly glum, keeping with the darkening story, and Harry broods the loner’s path for a time as Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) try to crack his shell and restore the team dynamic. There is less attitudinal rage than in the book, however, blunting J. K. Rowling’s thrust of angst.

Blunted angst cheats the film a bit. At its heart, this story is a classic British schoolboy rebellion tale. Or else it wants to be. The Ministry, in the role of villainous big-brother government, evidences its omnipresent eye and tries to take over the school so it may program Hogwarts’ youth for public order. Bristling youth take umbrage and rebel in underground gatherings and open defiance.

It’s an angle rich with potential, and director David Yates seems tempted to play with this core. One or two dystopian touches hint at where his own imagination is leading, and he crafts fine scenes in the vein of fighting the power while staying true to the lighter tone of the children’s book series. But he isn’t quite bold enough to assume Rowling’s authorial intent and give the theme full rein, and the film seems oddly constricted by its effort.

As is usual for the Potter films, filmmakers have had to chip at the story with liberal abridgement to contain it to feature length. This time it’s the tabloid retaliation against skewed news that is nixed. Umbridge’s takeover and Harry’s underground dark arts classes remain. For the most part the cuts work, but in places missing bridges in the plot leave obvious voids in the storytelling, making for some choppy progression. Mike Newell’s Goblet of Fire was more successful at smoothing its condensed story. Cuts in this film are most unfortunate at the climax in the Department of Mysteries, where some of the book’s most creative scenes are dropped for the sake of a simpler finish. (Those hoping to see a baby’s head on a death eater’s body will be saddened.)

Visually, the film is very similar to Newell’s Goblet. Alfonso Cuarón’s Prisoner of Azkaban still stands out as the series’ best. It was crafted with that vintage pulp aesthetic that mirrored the story so well and created a film thick with mood. This one continues the return to clean-cut blockbuster cinematics, relying on characters, effects and artful setwork for mood and ambience. The film does not disappoint in this, as deft art direction and colorful acting continues to bring the magical to life while offering plenty of fresh ambience that is uniquely appropriate to this darker story.

Yates does succeed in ushering Harry Potter into a darker phase while keeping the tale light and friendly enough for the book series’ young fans to enjoy the ride. The action is well executed, and touches of wit make welcome, effective relief from the story’s overcast mood.

In the end, this is still primarily a series for the kids. As such it is fine work, and plenty entertaining for adult fans as well. Grab your nearest portkey for this one.

Good fantasy • PG-13 • 138 min.


| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |


 Return to
| Top | Homepage |

Bay Weekly