Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Mark Burns
Grab your nearest portkey for this one. The wizarding wunderkind enters his blue period in this capable adaptation.
Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) skulks through summer break following a rough fourth year at Hogwarts. Cut off from the magical world, he’s left in the dark about evil wizard Voldemort’s uprising until an attack thrusts him back into the thick of things. The magical world proves not so welcome a place anymore, as Harry is rejected as an agitator, avoided by his mentor and addled by troubling dreams. Even Hogwarts is a tainted haven, as the Ministry of Magic foists itself upon the school through prissy menace Ms. Umbridge (Imelda Staunton, Freedom Writers), the latest Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher. So does the fifth year become a quest to loose the ministry’s girdle and follow troubling visions in a personal quest to check Voldemort’s rise.
Book five brought adolescent moodiness to bear on Harry’s character, and the film follows suit in its approach. The ambience is decidedly glum, keeping with the darkening story, and Harry broods the loner’s path for a time as Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) try to crack his shell and restore the team dynamic. There is less attitudinal rage than in the book, however, blunting J. K. Rowling’s thrust of angst.
Blunted angst cheats the film a bit. At its heart, this story is a classic British schoolboy rebellion tale. Or else it wants to be. The Ministry, in the role of villainous big-brother government, evidences its omnipresent eye and tries to take over the school so it may program Hogwarts’ youth for public order. Bristling youth take umbrage and rebel in underground gatherings and open defiance.
It’s an angle rich with potential, and director David Yates seems tempted to play with this core. One or two dystopian touches hint at where his own imagination is leading, and he crafts fine scenes in the vein of fighting the power while staying true to the lighter tone of the children’s book series. But he isn’t quite bold enough to assume Rowling’s authorial intent and give the theme full rein, and the film seems oddly constricted by its effort.
As is usual for the Potter films, filmmakers have had to chip at the story with liberal abridgement to contain it to feature length. This time it’s the tabloid retaliation against skewed news that is nixed. Umbridge’s takeover and Harry’s underground dark arts classes remain. For the most part the cuts work, but in places missing bridges in the plot leave obvious voids in the storytelling, making for some choppy progression. Mike Newell’s Goblet of Fire was more successful at smoothing its condensed story. Cuts in this film are most unfortunate at the climax in the Department of Mysteries, where some of the book’s most creative scenes are dropped for the sake of a simpler finish. (Those hoping to see a baby’s head on a death eater’s body will be saddened.)
Visually, the film is very similar to Newell’s Goblet. Alfonso Cuarón’s Prisoner of Azkaban still stands out as the series’ best. It was crafted with that vintage pulp aesthetic that mirrored the story so well and created a film thick with mood. This one continues the return to clean-cut blockbuster cinematics, relying on characters, effects and artful setwork for mood and ambience. The film does not disappoint in this, as deft art direction and colorful acting continues to bring the magical to life while offering plenty of fresh ambience that is uniquely appropriate to this darker story.
Yates does succeed in ushering Harry Potter into a darker phase while keeping the tale light and friendly enough for the book series’ young fans to enjoy the ride. The action is well executed, and touches of wit make welcome, effective relief from the story’s overcast mood.
In the end, this is still primarily a series for the kids. As such it is fine work, and plenty entertaining for adult fans as well. Grab your nearest portkey for this one.
Good fantasy • PG-13 • 138 min.