Volume 12, Issue 52 ~ December 23 - December 29, 2004
Current Issue
Could a Cowboy's Promise Save Christmas?
Editorial
Letters to the Editor
Submit Letters to Editor Online
Bay Reflections
Bay Life
Burton on the Bay
Dock of The Bay
Earth Journal
Earth Talk
Local Bounty 2004
Sky Watch
Tidelog
8 Days a Week

Music Notes

Submit Your Events Online

Curtain Call
Flickerings
Movie Times
Classifieds
Archives
Bay Weekly in Your Mailbox
Print Advertising Rates
Distribution Spots
Behind Bay Weekly
Syndicates
Contact Us

Powered by



Search bayweekly.com
Search WWW

Got an Envionmental Question? Send it to: EARTH TALK, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881. Or submit your question at: www.emagazine.com. Or e-mail us at: earthtalk@emagazine.com.
From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine

On the Snowy Slope, Environmentally Speaking
What is the impact of the skiing industry on our environment?
 
While skiing affords millions of enthusiasts the opportunity to enjoy the great outdoors during the winter, its impact on the environment is fairly substantial. The creation and ongoing expansion of ski resorts leads to the development of otherwise unspoiled alpine ecosystems and often destroys vital wildlife habitat. Ski resorts also use substantial amounts of water for snowmaking and other activities, and they generate significant carbon dioxide pollution from energy used to run lifts and visitor facilities.

For instance, Colorado’s famed Aspen Mountain ski resort churns through 45 million gallons of water each year to make snow in the winter, irrigate the landscape in the summer and provide for the personal needs of staff and visitors year round. Sprawling guest accommodations, not to mention the construction of new trails and runs, have kept the endangered Canada lynx — as well as myriad other alpine fish and wildlife species — on the run and teetering on the brink of extinction. Meanwhile, the resort’s mechanical facilities and related services emit 76 pounds of carbon dioxide per skier each year. Despite these statistics, Aspen is still considered to be among the more environmentally responsible ski resorts.

In light of such problems as well as increased pressure from environmental advocates, many ski resorts in recent years have started to focus on lightening the impact of their operations. More than 170 ski resorts — representing about 60 percent of U.S. skier destinations — have signed onto the National Ski Areas Association’s environmental charter, which calls for responsible management of resources, decreased energy use and limits on development. While adherence to the charter’s tenets is voluntary, its adoption by a majority of the country’s leading ski resorts is a step in the right direction.

Meanwhile, the non-profit Ski Area Citizens’ Coalition publishes an annual Ski Area Environmental Scorecard rating hundreds of U.S. ski resorts on the basis of environmentally sound management practices, especially individual resorts’ efforts to maintain ski terrain and service facilities within existing boundaries so as to maximize the preservation of undisturbed lands. The coalition’s criteria also include the protection of wetlands, old growth forest, unique geological formations and roadless areas. Energy and water consumption habits are also taken into account. Some Colorado ski resorts that received high marks in that regard include Aspen, Buttermilk and Wolf Creek

Meanwhile, a handful of forward-thinking operations — including Mt. Hood Meadows, Cooper Spur and Mount Bachelor in Oregon, Deer Valley and Park City in Utah, and Lake Tahoe’s Northstar in California — allow skiers to add a few extra dollars onto their lift ticket prices to purchase wind energy, which then increases the amount of clean energy that goes into the grid that powers the operations.
 
For more information:


© COPYRIGHT 2004 by New Bay Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.