Search bayweekly.com
Search Google

 

Current Issue

What's Going On...

Classifieds

Archives

Advertising

Volume 15, Issue 14 ~ April 5 - April 11, 2007

Got an Environmental Question? Send it to: EARTH TALK, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881. Or submit your question at: www.emagazine.com. Or e-mail us at: earthtalk@emagazine.com.

From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine


Wind Power vs. Wildlife

Clean-energy turbines could be more bird friendly

I have heard that wind power turbines kill a lot of birds, including migrating flocks, and that some people oppose wind power for that reason. If this is true, to what degree do they harm birds and what is being done about it?

—Ken Lassman, Lawrence, Kansas

It is ironic that non-polluting, renewable wind energy, long touted as a potential savior in the fight to stop global warming, is getting a bad rap for killing wildlife. High profile examples such as at California’s Altamont Pass — where outdated, oversized wind turbines kill some 1,000 birds of prey each year — plague the growing wind power industry — even though more modern, better-sited wind farms kill far fewer birds.

According to a 2002 study of anthropogenic (human-caused) bird mortality conducted by researcher Wallace Erickson, birds face daily threats far more lethal than wind turbines. Erickson’s study found that between 500 million and one billion birds are killed annually in the United States alone from collisions with man-made structures including communications towers, buildings and windows and contact with power lines. Hunting, cat predation, pesticides, commercial fishing operations, oil spills and cars and trucks also take a heavy toll. All this is important to realize, say wind power advocates, in putting the relative impact of windmills on bird populations in perspective: Contact with wind turbines represented less that one percent of the total number of human-caused bird deaths in Erickson’s study.

There are, however, steps that can be taken when constructing wind power turbines to minimize their impact on birds. The American Bird Conservancy advises that lighting on turbines should be minimized, tension wires and lattice supports should be avoided and wind turbine power lines should be placed underground whenever possible. Also, already more modern wind towers are being designed in ways that prevent birds from perching on them, solving one of the problems with the Altamont Pass towers. Newer turbine blades also rotate much slower than earlier designs.

In addition, says American Bird Conservancy, careful reviews of potential wind turbine sites should be conducted. Known bird migration pathways, areas where birds are highly concentrated, and landscapes known for their popularity with birds should be avoided “unless mortality risk has been analyzed and the likelihood of significant mortality has been ruled out.” Wind farms should be situated on already disturbed land, such as in agricultural areas, so as not to displace existing bird habitat or travel corridors. Sites should also be reviewed for use by birds listed under the Endangered Species Act.

Ever-growing concerns about global warming and pollution from fossil fuel use demand that we move as quickly as possible toward clean, renewable energy sources, even if they are as yet imperfect.

“When you look at a wind turbine,” says John Flicker, president of the National Audubon Society, “you can find the bird carcasses and count them. With a coal-fired power plant, you can’t count the carcasses, but it’s going to kill a lot more birds.” Indeed, according to Erickson, for every 10,000 birds killed by human activities, less than one death is caused by a wind turbine. If greenhouse gases are not reduced significantly in the next decade, we could bear witness to a large number of plant and animal extinctions in the coming years.

For more information:

• American Bird Conservancy: www.abcbirds.org.

• American Wind Energy Association: www.awea.org.

• National Audubon Society: www.audubon.org.

Got an environmental question? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/thisweek: or e-mail earthtalk@emagazine.com. Read past columns at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/archives.php.

Current Issue \\ Archives \\ Subscriptions \\ Clasified Advertising \\ Display Advertising
Distribution Spots \\ Behind Bay Weekly \\ Contact Us \\ Submit Letters to Editor \\ Submit Your Events

© COPYRIGHT 2007 by New Bay Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.