Volume 16, Issue 22 - May 29-June 4, 2008

Search bayweekly.com
Search Google

Got an Environmental Question? Send it to: EARTH TALK, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881. Or submit your question at: www.emagazine.com. Or e-mail us at: earthtalk@emagazine.com.

From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine

How Soda Worsens Global Warming

Your carbon footprint gets a bit bigger with every soft drink

How much of an effect, if any, does the carbon dioxide in carbonated beverages have on global warming?

–Michael Holmes, Shenandoah, Virginia

A typical 12-ounce can of soda contains up to six grams (.013 pounds) of carbon dioxide gas, which either escapes into the atmosphere from the liquid upon opening — or from your body after you consume the contents. So yes, drinking carbonated beverages does contribute to your carbon footprint, but only ever so slightly.

To provide some context, every time you burn a gallon of gas driving in your car from point A to B, about 20 pounds of carbon dioxide wafts skyward (if you find this hard to believe, visit the U.S. Department of Energy’s fuel economy website at: www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/co2.shtml). So a typical car commute to work produces upwards of 700 times the greenhouse gases as drinking that can of Coke.

But cans and bottles of carbonated (or non-carbonated) drinks are still no friends of the environment. The production and distribution of single-serving beverages of all kinds generates untold millions of tons of greenhouse gases and other pollutants every year — while also wasting billions of gallons of fresh water. Once the drinks have been consumed, all those cans and plastic bottles have to go somewhere.

Some communities are diligent enough to capture more than half of all such containers for recycling, an activity which itself generates significant amounts of greenhouse gases. But that still means that more than 40 billion cans and bottles are ending up in landfills each year, or even worse, as litter, according to data compiled by the non-profit Container Recycling Institute.

Each un-recycled can or bottle then must be replaced by an equivalent one made from virgin materials. Container Recycling Institute reports that just the manufacture of these replacement aluminum cans each year generates about 3.5 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions while also causing other environmental damage from the extraction of the bauxite from which aluminum is made. From the significant number of plastic single-serving drink bottles thrown away and not recycled each year, even larger amounts of resources are used (petroleum-based in this case) and greenhouse gases emitted.

Consumers can take a bite out of all this resource waste and pollution by remembering that, first and foremost, water is the least costly and healthiest beverage of all — on virtually all personal and ecological counts. Water drawn from the kitchen faucet requires no disposable packaging or shipping to get there, thanks to the highly efficient water-delivery systems that have been in place in developed countries in the vast majority of communities for a very long time.

For those who cannot get by without their soft drinks — carbonated or otherwise — the best way to lower that carbon footprint is to buy them in large containers and parse out servings in cups or glasses. A typical two-liter (67.6 ounce) plastic soda bottle holds five and a half times the liquid of a 12-ounce container and over four times that of a 16-ounce container, so it is easy to imagine the resource savings over time.

For more information:

• Container Recycling Institute: .

• Fueleconomy.gov: www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/co2.shtml.

Got an environmental question? Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it at www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/thisweek: or e-mail earthtalk@emagazine.com. Read past columns at: www.emagazine.com/earthtalk/archives.php.

© COPYRIGHT 2008 by New Bay Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.