Volume 14, Issue 5 ~ February 2 - February 8, 2006

Using this Search Engine helps the Bay Weekly raise money so bookmark this page & get googling!

Search bayweekly.com

Search Goggle

Got an Environmental Question? Send it to: EARTH TALK, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881. Or submit your question at: www.emagazine.com. Or e-mail us at: earthtalk@emagazine.com.
From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine

Absorbing the Facts on Sponges

Living sea sponges vs. synthetic sponges — what’s the greener choice?

Is it true that some sponges used for cleaning and bathing are real sea sponges? If so, are they endangered by our using them? Which are more eco-friendly, real or synthetic?

—Lin Heidt, Canmore, Alberta, Canada

While it is true that real sea sponges have been in use since the Roman Empire, synthetic alternatives made primarily from wood pulp became commonplace by the middle of the 20th century when DuPont perfected the process of manufacturing them. Today most of the sponges we use are made from a combination of wood pulp (cellulose), sodium sulphate crystals, hemp fibers and chemical softeners.

Some forest advocates decry the use of wood pulp for producing sponges, claiming that the process encourages logging, but the manufacture of cellulose-based sponges is a pretty clean affair. No harmful byproducts result and there is little waste, as trimmings are ground up and recycled back into the mix.

Another common type of artificial sponge is made of polyurethane foam. These sponges excel at cleaning but are less ideal from an environmental perspective, as the manufacturing process relies on ozone-depleting hydrocarbons (set to be phased out by 2030) to blow the foam into shape. Also, polyurethane can emit formaldehyde and other irritants and can form cancer-causing dioxins when incinerated.

Some real sea sponges are still sold today, used for everything from cleaning car and boat exteriors to removing make-up and exfoliating the skin. The product of at least 700 million years of evolution, sea sponges are among the world’s simplest living organisms. They survive by filtering microscopic plants and oxygen from the water, growing slowly over many decades. Commercially, they are prized for their natural softness and resistance to tearing and their ability to absorb and discharge large amounts of water. Scientists know of more than 5,000 different species, though we only harvest a handful of them, such as the exfoliating Honeycomb (Hippospongia communis) and the silky smooth Fina (Spongia officinalis).

Environmentalists are concerned about protecting sea sponges, especially because we still know so little about them, particularly with regard to their potential medicinal usefulness and their role in the food chain. For example, researchers are optimistic that chemicals emitted from some living sea sponges could be synthesized to create new arthritis treatments and possibly even cancer fighters. And sea sponges serve as the primary food source for endangered hawksbill sea turtles. Shrinking amounts of natural sponge could push the prehistoric creature over the brink to extinction.

Sea sponges are under threat not only from over-harvesting but also from sewage discharge and stormwater runoff, as well as from scallop dredging activity, according to the Australian Marine Conservation Society. Global warming, which has been increasing water temperatures and altering the ocean food chain and sea floor environment accordingly, is also now a factor. The organization reports that very few sponge gardens are protected. It is advocating the creation of marine protected areas and more sensitive fishing methods in regions where sea sponge remain abundant.

For more information:

• Australian Marine Conservation Society: www.amcs.org.au.

Send your environmental questions to earthtalk@emagazine.com.

© COPYRIGHT 2004 by New Bay Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.